PALMER84ONE
Husqvarna
AA Class
As much as I like Beta, I think it may be the other way around. KTM did the R&D and others benefited.
Not true, but I don't argue with people.

As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.
When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.
Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.
Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.
Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.
Thanks for your patience and support!
As much as I like Beta, I think it may be the other way around. KTM did the R&D and others benefited.
Not true, but I don't argue with people.![]()
More like Beta did a bunch of R&D for KTM and shared info with Husky brothers.![]()
...We know Husqvarna wheels fit Beta...
KTM did the R&D and others benefited.
I can also tell you that the newest generation Beta feels nothing like a KTM or Italian Husqvarna.[/quote]
Not a KTM basher, just never could feel good riding any of the ones I have been on.
Man, you can say that again!
they all have their own engineering depts........but break the bikes down...all the EU bikes. they all source their parts from various EU (most of hard parts) and Japanese Mfgrs (JP most of electronics). So if you break any of these bikes down you find common parts all over the place. PS KTM is major moto chassis builder and will even build you one if you contract them to do so. Grimeca did wheel hubs for Husky, they all use Braking and discs and brembo brakes as well as formula and nissin, those are just couple of examples. Excel rims. Outside sourced triple clamps, bearings, handle bars, levers and control mostly Domino on EU bikes, there are many more.
Husky used to use Verlicchi for their chassis builder (Ducati, Aprilia and others too).
Husky used Gilardoni foundry for their engine blocks and I wouldnt doubt if other brands have or had used them as well.
Reverse engineering at the Beta engineering dept??? Why not, they first bought end of the project line KTM RFS engines for their 4T enduros then put together their own engines, which seem/appear to share alot with their north of border KTM machines. I dont think there is a phone con between them, but with all the laser scanning tech and rev engineering simplicity and cost savings, I'll bet Beta did do some R-E for their machines,,,,and who made the Transmissions? maybe the same firm as KTM? Pistons Valves clutches rods, those are all sourced from major component manufacturers anyway. There is no argument Beta is more moto market Biz savvy unlike the old Husky crew.
they all have their own engineering depts........but break the bikes down...all the EU bikes. they all source their parts from various EU (most of hard parts) and Japanese Mfgrs (JP most of electronics). So if you break any of these bikes down you find common parts all over the place. PS KTM is major moto chassis builder and will even build you one if you contract them to do so. Grimeca did wheel hubs for Husky, they all use Braking and discs and brembo brakes as well as formula and nissin, those are just couple of examples. Excel rims. Outside sourced triple clamps, bearings, handle bars, levers and control mostly Domino on EU bikes, there are many more.
Husky used to use Verlicchi for their chassis builder (Ducati, Aprilia and others too).
Husky used Gilardoni foundry for their engine blocks and I wouldnt doubt if other brands have or had used them as well.
Reverse engineering at the Beta engineering dept??? Why not, they first bought end of the project line KTM RFS engines for their 4T enduros then put together their own engines, which seem/appear to share alot with their north of border KTM machines. I dont think there is a phone con between them, but with all the laser scanning tech and rev engineering simplicity and cost savings, I'll bet Beta did do some R-E for their machines,,,,and who made the Transmissions? maybe the same firm as KTM? Pistons Valves clutches rods, those are all sourced from major component manufacturers anyway. There is no argument Beta is more moto market Biz savvy unlike the old Husky crew.
they all have their own engineering depts........but break the bikes down...all the EU bikes. they all source their parts from various EU (most of hard parts) and Japanese Mfgrs (JP most of electronics). So if you break any of these bikes down you find common parts all over the place. PS KTM is major moto chassis builder and will even build you one if you contract them to do so. Grimeca did wheel hubs for Husky, they all use Braking and discs and brembo brakes as well as formula and nissin, those are just couple of examples. Excel rims. Outside sourced triple clamps, bearings, handle bars, levers and control mostly Domino on EU bikes, there are many more.
Husky used to use Verlicchi for their chassis builder (Ducati, Aprilia and others too).
Husky used Gilardoni foundry for their engine blocks and I wouldnt doubt if other brands have or had used them as well.
Reverse engineering at the Beta engineering dept??? Why not, they first bought end of the project line KTM RFS engines for their 4T enduros then put together their own engines, which seem/appear to share alot with their north of border KTM machines. I dont think there is a phone con between them, but with all the laser scanning tech and rev engineering simplicity and cost savings, I'll bet Beta did do some R-E for their machines,,,,and who made the Transmissions? maybe the same firm as KTM? Pistons Valves clutches rods, those are all sourced from major component manufacturers anyway. There is no argument Beta is more moto market Biz savvy unlike the old Husky crew.
The Beta seemed very KTM like to me, after year on my Husaberg TE250.....I can also tell you that the newest generation Beta feels nothing like a KTM or Italian Husqvarna.
It feels like, well, a Beta!
Not sure exactly what you mean, but I will say the Italian Husqvarnas are great bikes in both performance and toughness.So is it one set in front of behind the Alpha dog (husky) is the question.![]()
There is something addictive about riding a Beta though, not sure exactly what it is, just seems very quick and light.
I don't care what bike it may or may not feel like! LOL For sure it is less KTM like than the new Husky's will be!
All that matters is it is ITALIAN, BEAUTIFUL, RELIABLE, REASONABLY PRICED, company is financially stable, and works right out of the crate!
If Italian Husqvarna had been allowed to accomplish that, we would all be jumping for joy and not even be having this conversation!