Hey guys, have had my eye on the '14 TXC310R for a while now. I haven't ridden one but have read a fair bit about them on Café Husky and can get a brand newie for around $7000 aussie dollars.
Enter the Yammy YZ250FX.
Now this is an exciting machine and in my opinion targets the same market that the above Husky does. Aussie price for this bike is around $11,500.
Am looking for a hand from you guys to do a cross comparison of these bikes and from this I can make a better decision. A lot of you have ridden the TXC and can give great input but as the FX is a new bike on the market (and a Yammy) I'd guess most of us will base our opinions on reviews we have read and the fact that it's based closely on the YZ and WR. Because of this I imagine it gives us a better platform to base our opinions on.
I have been reading the info you guys have been posting on the FX specific thread here and it seems like most agree it will be a great bike for what it's built for.
Oh I should mention that I come of years of riding KDX200's, a few 250 4T, a 450 4T and now ridding a mates 300exe. Based on this, and what I've read, I believe a 310cc would be a suitable bike size for me although I know a lot of people are stating the new YZ250FX is a very powerful bike for it's size. Hence this thread.
I don't want you to query me on my riding styles etc. but moreso concentrate on how the bikes differ and why you would choose each bike. If we can get some good info here then I will be able to evaluate 'which bike' for myself.
Hey, if you want to talk about KTM's equivalent go ahead.
I thought I would check out the spec sheet and compare spec notes Won't tell you much about the rideability of each bike but it's a start.
Wheel base, seat height, dry weight, everything seems to be very similar.
Husky http://www.topspeed.com/motorcycles...qvarna/2014-husqvarna-txc-310-r-ar163147.html
Yammy http://www.yamaha-motor.com.au/products/motorcycle/offroad/enduro/15-yz250fx-0
Some factors to start us off.
The TXC is a run out bike that is a few years old in design against the FX which is pretty much the latest and greatest in MX design.
The engines sizes are different but this might not be a disadvantage.
The FX is a kilo lighter but the FXC has an extra litre of fuel in the tank = similar wet weight.
What are your thoughts?
Enter the Yammy YZ250FX.
Now this is an exciting machine and in my opinion targets the same market that the above Husky does. Aussie price for this bike is around $11,500.
Am looking for a hand from you guys to do a cross comparison of these bikes and from this I can make a better decision. A lot of you have ridden the TXC and can give great input but as the FX is a new bike on the market (and a Yammy) I'd guess most of us will base our opinions on reviews we have read and the fact that it's based closely on the YZ and WR. Because of this I imagine it gives us a better platform to base our opinions on.
I have been reading the info you guys have been posting on the FX specific thread here and it seems like most agree it will be a great bike for what it's built for.
Oh I should mention that I come of years of riding KDX200's, a few 250 4T, a 450 4T and now ridding a mates 300exe. Based on this, and what I've read, I believe a 310cc would be a suitable bike size for me although I know a lot of people are stating the new YZ250FX is a very powerful bike for it's size. Hence this thread.
I don't want you to query me on my riding styles etc. but moreso concentrate on how the bikes differ and why you would choose each bike. If we can get some good info here then I will be able to evaluate 'which bike' for myself.
Hey, if you want to talk about KTM's equivalent go ahead.
I thought I would check out the spec sheet and compare spec notes Won't tell you much about the rideability of each bike but it's a start.
Wheel base, seat height, dry weight, everything seems to be very similar.
Husky http://www.topspeed.com/motorcycles...qvarna/2014-husqvarna-txc-310-r-ar163147.html
Yammy http://www.yamaha-motor.com.au/products/motorcycle/offroad/enduro/15-yz250fx-0
Some factors to start us off.
The TXC is a run out bike that is a few years old in design against the FX which is pretty much the latest and greatest in MX design.
The engines sizes are different but this might not be a disadvantage.
The FX is a kilo lighter but the FXC has an extra litre of fuel in the tank = similar wet weight.
What are your thoughts?