• Hi everyone,

    As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.

    When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.

    Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.

    Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.

    Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.

    Thanks for your patience and support!

TE350 for 2012??

IDK, but the sweet TE 310 has hit the mark every year. I think everyone is happy with the 310 filling that sweet spot that the other mfg's. are missing. Do you think Husky would want to put out a bike in a cc range they already own?
 
With the TE310 getting a new frame and now based off the X-lite 250 engine this year, I don't see it jumping to 350 any time soon. In fact, it may not be viable to increase the displacement that much in the X-lite engine. I see Husky continuing to refine a winning model, tweaking the fuel injection, tuning the suspension, etc.
 
Wheeling Jo said:
Why ... I really like the looks of the TE449 (bigger fueltank for sure) ??
Click to expand...

TE310 started out with the same "big" frame and engine as TE450/510 (even the old TE250 shared this engine /frame family). It has now been put into the smaller, lighter TE250 frame/engine.... small bike big power. Basing a TE310 off TE449/511 family would be a step back.... to big bike, little motor. Not rocket science....
 
Norman Foley said:
TE310 started out with the same "big" frame and engine as TE450/510 (even the old TE250 shared this engine /frame family). It has now been put into the smaller, lighter TE250 frame/engine.... small bike big power. Basing a TE310 off TE449/511 family would be a step back.... to big bike, little motor. Not rocket science....
Click to expand...

Never looked at it that way but I still like the looks of de TE499. Currently riding a TE310 2007 and at the end of this year I will have to dicide : TE310 or TE449.
I'm 1m76 and way 100 kg ( I know .... ) but I live in Belgian where they have good food, beer and chocolate :-))

grtz
 
I'm not so sure basing it off the 449/511 would be a bad thing. After riding my TE511 if they could make a TXC349 (he he he) based on the new bike, shed about 10 pounds it would be a fantastic mount IMHO. I bought my TE511 as a DS bike. But after riding it I think I would like a TXC449 better than my 2010 TXC250 for an off road only mount as the motor is far better (runs perfect, is smooth and has no engine braking) and the rest of the bike is very good too. Not quite as flickable but as a lightened 349 it might be. Don't rule out how good the new bike is till you ride one (and long enough to understand it and how good it is).

- I rode my fully street legal TE511 in some of the tightest stuff we have here with a friend on a KTM300 who is about the same speed as me and was able to stay on his tire when he led and slowly gap him when I led. Surprisingly i would have been no faster on my WR144 or TXC250. He was amazed how i hustled the DS TE511 through the tight stuff. I really had no issues with it in the tight stuff. I know this all sounds wrong but thats the facts. The new platform is very good, the motor is a pure joy, the suspension is very good for rough trail, it tracks awesome, stays planted, gets amazing traction everywhere and it feels lighter than it should.

Maybe ScottyR can chime in also as he went from a TXC250 to the TXC449 for off road.
 
oregonsage said:
Not.

The chassis on the 449 is a step forward as is the new engine. The CTS system itself could make the 310 a better bike. I shopped both and bought a 511 as much for the chassis as the engine.
Click to expand...

I guess our difference is.... I wouldn't be shopping both ends of the spectrum. I'm a small guy and want a small bike. WR144 suits me well. TE310 in the X-Lite concept is as big as I would go, as I have no interest in a 450 or 500 4 stroke. I'm sure the TE449/511 is a great bike and if they could downsize the whole package, like the present 125/250/310, I might look at that. I rode an '01 TE400 for a couple of years and now have a '93 WXE350 for a 4 stroke fix, but neither work well for me in the conditions I ride in.
 
Think of it as like Chevrolet in the 60s. They had the small block and the big block. The 449/511 is the big block and the X-Lite is the small block.

Now they just need to bring CTS to the rest of the line.

Then they can enter the 21st century and go with modern aluminum frames that aren't designed to flex (and therefore fatigue).
 
they still make those things??? joking lol is it only the u.s. that is trying to phase them(2strokes) out or is that a international deal?? hell it might mainly be with the boat motors not sure.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top