As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.
When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.
Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.
Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.
Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.
Thanks for your patience and support!
Your side discussion, could you start a new thread or start a Conversation/PM?Dude, what the heck is your point? Are you trying to say that Audi doesn't play in a higher "market space" than VW, because they are owned by VW?
Audi DEFINITELY plays in a higher market space than VW. Period. Same with Lexus and Toyota. Yes, the "lesser" brands in both cases have some "higher end" vehicles; that doesn't make the statement, as a whole, untrue. In general, on average, Audi competes in a higher market than VW. PERIOD! This is a fact!
Tata (India) owns Land Rover; are you going to argue that because of this, Land Rover isn't a premium product, compared to the world's cheapest car?
Why don't you try summarizing what you are trying to say, instead of just posting nebulous little quips.
Makes sense to me, given Pierer's explanation. As mentioned before, new TE449/511 have already seen a significant price drop in Europe recently.Here is my current theory:
Yamaha, Honda, Suzuki, Kawasaki: Seem to be in the $7k-$8.5k as per their US websites
KTM, and presumably Husaberg & Beta: Seem to be in the $8.5-$10k range
Husqvarna seems like a good fit if they want lower price set of bikes to sell, which would obviously impact future designs.
Currently Husqvarna msrp is between $7k-$9k, or $8.4k-$9k if you do not include the TR650's
Sure would be nice to watch a Husqvarna out front on TV!
Stefan Pierer: "We think that with Husqvarna we can be active in another niche and take more of the market especially from the Japanese brands. We will with this brand's products focus primarily on brands such as Yamaha, Suzuki and Kawasaki. We would like the niche brand to go to a sale of 10,000 units per year and then go on from there. For that Husqvarna must go back to his roots, it was much too far astray. The brand has a wonderful history but because of a wrong model policy it was completely on the wrong track. it was in terms of dealer network not ready to sell two cylinders for the street. We will work with Husqvarna go back to its origins. We will therefore soon be back in motocross and then in supermoto, both sports which Husqvarna previously been dominant. Within the next year we will develop an appropriate motorcycle with the specifications and character that belongs to a Husqvarna. "
Hell YES!
I've been waiting for this from the Vintage Forum. I still own and ride my Swedish Huskys, so I get a response.... That's pure BS. Cagiva improved the breed and won more than 2/3rds of Husky's World Championships. When Husky had it's 100th Anniversary of Motorcycle Production... Husqvarna AB and Cagiva celebrated together in Sweden. You want to hold a grudge... Tell the wife to throw out all her Electrolux appliances, as they decided that Motorcycles didn't fit their product line.
Stefan Pierer is talking about taking back Husqvarna to the race scene in MX and supermoto, places where KTM already rules. And he is talking about Husqvarna as a niche marke. Husaberg was a niche marke, Husqvarna is not.
Can anyone explain what he is talking about?
I saw your request...Why don't we welcome Stefan Pierer on board. We should be welcoming his acquisition.
Think we would gain more ground with some positive imput to get the brand back.
How about we create a new index on front page of Cafe Husky? Pierre AG/HVA?
Then have sections that we can place ideas in to request things/ideas to build the brands:
2 stroke ( minis, 200, DI, electric start, map switches, etc....) just ideas.
4 stroke
Dual sport
Supermoto
Racing
Accessories
Contingency
Just some thoughts.
Heikki Mikkola, the “Flyin’ Finn” was one of the most popular and feared motocross racers of the 1970s. During his illustrious career, Mikkola collected four World Grand Prix Motocross Championship titles.
............
Husqvarna asked Mikkola to return to the Grand Prix 500cc class in 1974, and he eagerly accepted. After a season-long battle with Roger DeCoster, Mikkola won the World Grand Prix 500cc Championship.
And I might add, Bengt Aberg, Brad Lackey, Chuck Sun....all Husqvarna MX racers
Nieuwsmotor: How do you integrate Husqvarna and KTM?
Stefan Pierer: “The brands will remain self sufficient in terms of brand perception, models and sales networks, but as I mentioned earlier, there will be a lot of behind the scenes cooperation in the field of R&D, purchasing, components and more. We’re not sure if production will remain in Varese, Italy or move to Mattinghofen, Austria.”
“Initially, Husqvarna was bought by my private company, Pierer Industry, but in the future this may change and possibly involve our Indian partner Bajaj.”
I grew up in the 80's so I remember TC, Scot, Mike Melton, Ed Lojak, Dan A. and Dan S., Dick Burleson etc.. That's what Husky means to
Sure would be nice to watch a Husqvarna out front on TV!
Stefan Pierer: "We think that with Husqvarna we can be active in another niche and take more of the market especially from the Japanese brands. We will with this brand's products focus primarily on brands such as Yamaha, Suzuki and Kawasaki. We would like the niche brand to go to a sale of 10,000 units per year and then go on from there. For that Husqvarna must go back to his roots, it was much too far astray. The brand has a wonderful history but because of a wrong model policy it was completely on the wrong track. it was in terms of dealer network not ready to sell two cylinders for the street. We will work with Husqvarna go back to its origins. We will therefore soon be back in motocross and then in supermoto, both sports which Husqvarna previously been dominant. Within the next year we will develop an appropriate motorcycle with the specifications and character that belongs to a Husqvarna. "
Hell YES!
Stefan Pierer is talking about taking back Husqvarna to the race scene in MX and supermoto, places where KTM already rules. And he is talking about Husqvarna as a niche marke. Husaberg was a niche marke, Husqvarna is not.
It bugged you enough to post your first post..... Enjoy those Swedish Huskys, I sure do.Thats fine, you are entitled to think its BS. I dont hold any grudges, A grudge would imply I care about Cagiva, which I dont. The fact remains, *I* dont care what happens to Cagiva.