• 2 Stroke Husqvarna Motorcycles Made In Italy - About 1989 to 2014
     WR = 2st Enduro & CR = 2st Cross

  • Hi everyone,

    As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.

    When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.

    Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.

    Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.

    Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.

    Thanks for your patience and support!

All 2st 250 or 300... YZ or WR?

surfingboyo

surfingboyo

Husqvarna
AA Class
I just sold my KTM 350 4t, so I am looking to get a 2nd hand 250 or 300 2t.
It is going to be a second bike, probably the main bike to my 2011 WR165.
Budget is a factor, so pretty much rules out the latish ktm/bergs...

I ride lots of super technical kind of stuff, so the torque of a 300 really appeals.
But then you have the YZ250 alloy framers. A little bit of money spent on them and I reckon they'd be a really good 'woods' bike (and I'm sure you could set them up for torque, maybe even use a 300 kit?).

Are the WR300's a good bike, and how would you compare them to a YZ250? Anyone owned and ridden both?
They are fairly dated, so I'm guessing theres no real 'best' year for them is there?
Forks, are the KYB in the later years better then the marzocchi's?

I know this is a Husky forum!!!
:oldman:
 
I'd rather have my yz back after owning my 12 wr 300. Started easier, thinner, lighter, and if your budget minded parts are cheaper. If you want a 300 get a big bore for the yz. The kick start is awkward on the wr too. This doesn't mean i'm not ha ing fun on the husky though. Only prob i had w my 04 yz 250 is 3rd gear breaks, and in some crashes the pipe bends easy and doesn't seal to the cyl. If you search around you'll see the probs i had w the husky. The trans issue may have been delt w at somepoint after 04.
 
A YZ is hard to beat for a versatile woods platform to build whatever out of. Almost any year is good clear back to the steel frames 02 or even back to 98. Excellent motors but semi slow turning.
 
Whether or not the KYB forks are "better" is subjective. Both forks can work really well in offroad/woods conditions, neither fork is great for motocross. The YZs are great bikes. They'd need some suspension work and a pipe to use offroad, but arguably a WR is going to need that stuff anyway. I don't think that the YZ's alloy frame is really a benefit. If you need to plate the bike, it might be harder to do it on a YZ, depending on your state.

Just get whichever one is available at the best price to you.
 
yeah, weight is a massive factor and so is kicking ability.
with the yz i like the fact parts are everywhere, you can swap in WR (yammy) gears, pretty cheap to buy one with low hours.
i'll have a search for your probs with your 300 justpinit...

cheers, and anyone else?
 
Ok gl. If it was me, yz for sure. Or the other 3. If you buy the husky hit me up if you have probs, i know it inside and out.
 
I've been considering the same thing the last few days. I love my WR250, that was a 300 when I bought it, but this whole KTM buy out thing has just ruined my whole outlook on life.

The 300's are neat and fun for me to trail ride, but I don't care for them when it comes to racing. I prefer the 250's for racing and there isn't anything I miss about the 300 when I'm trail riding. But, there are 300 kits for the YZ now, if that's your bag.

I'd really like to have a Beta or Sherco, but they aren't that easy to get ahold of, and they are pricey. So, I've been kicking around the idea of just going back to a YZ250. I had a YZ and it was a great bike. Actually, the WR250 with the CR ignition reminds me of the YZ motor. If I was going to compare the WR to another bike it would have to be the YZ. A more workman like version, but very similar.

The YZ is smaller, thinner and lighter. Might be the lightest 250 smoker out there. It is probable a better fit for me physically than the WR. The WR is pretty tall and I'm pretty short. It doesn't seem heavy, but I now it's heavier than a YZ.

The best thing about the YZ are they are easier to find and about $2000.00 cheaper than a Beta, Sherco, KTM, or new Husqvarna-berg. I'm not crazy about going back to an Asian bike, as I really like these new Euro bikes, but life would be simpler. The YZ250 is the only new Asian bike I'd even consider right now.

The big problem is there is really nothing wrong with my WR. I've got it all set up with lots of tricks and it works really well. I've even got it plated and a 6 speed in it so I can dual sport it if I want.

So, I guess what I'm saying is they are both good bikes. I think the WR might have a longer life span, but both are good. I think the WR is built better.

If you are shorter you might lean toward the YZ. If you are tall, then the WR. But, IMO it's pretty close to a toss up.
 
Kyle Tarry said:
As a counterpoint, my WR has been nearly bulletproof. ~1200 miles (100+ hours) in 1 season and no significant issues.
Click to expand...


Buddy of mine had 7500 plus miles on his 07 WR250, still going stong and it is abused and not well taken care of. Very durable bikes for sure. Then again most 250 2 strokes are.
 
I've got a fellow member's '09 wr250 in my garage that has ~300 hours on the stock top end!
 
Since you pointed out you have a 165 and this next bike will be a second bike... do the 300. I have both, 165 and 300 and am glad! I just think the 250 is to close to the 165 in torque and power. I didn't want 2 bikes that were that similar. Now when I need a high speed sledge hammer I pull out the brut 300 and when I don't I ride the 165. Works out great!
 
These responses are all good. I prob got a " bad one". There are only a handfull of ppl who have had probs like mine. 300 hours on a top end?? Mine are good for about 40 if i had to guess. I run mine pretty hard (at times) so that's the reason. I always use top notch two stroke oil. I'm in no way bashing the bike, but it has it's quirks. If i could find someone to buy it it'd be gone in favour of a wr 144 or 165. I may just have week legs which cause my starting probs in hare scrambles.
 
MOTORHEAD said:
I've been considering the same thing the last few days. I love my WR250, that was a 300 when I bought it, but this whole KTM buy out thing has just ruined my whole outlook on life.

The 300's are neat and fun for me to trail ride, but I don't care for them when it comes to racing. I prefer the 250's for racing and there isn't anything I miss about the 300 when I'm trail riding. But, there are 300 kits for the YZ now, if that's your bag.



I'd really like to have a Beta or Sherco, but they aren't that easy to get ahold of, and they are pricey. So, I've been kicking around the idea of just going back to a YZ250. I had a YZ and it was a great bike. Actually, the WR250 with the CR ignition reminds me of the YZ motor. If I was going to compare the WR to another bike it would have to be the YZ. A more workman like version, but very similar.

The YZ is smaller, thinner and lighter. Might be the lightest 250 smoker out there. It is probable a better fit for me physically than the WR. The WR is pretty tall and I'm pretty short. It doesn't seem heavy, but I now it's heavier than a YZ.

The best thing about the YZ are they are easier to find and about $2000.00 cheaper than a Beta, Sherco, KTM, or new Husqvarna-berg. I'm not crazy about going back to an Asian bike, as I really like these new Euro bikes, but life would be simpler. The YZ250 is the only new Asian bike I'd even consider right now.

The big problem is there is really nothing wrong with my WR. I've got it all set up with lots of tricks and it works really well. I've even got it plated and a 6 speed in it so I can dual sport it if I want.

So, I guess what I'm saying is they are both good bikes. I think the WR might have a longer life span, but both are good. I think the WR is built better.

If you are shorter you might lean toward the YZ. If you are tall, then the WR. But, IMO it's pretty close to a toss up.
Click to expand...

Did the 250 cyl make it easier to start. I'm thinking about buying a 250 cyl
 
uranys said:
I've got a fellow member's '09 wr250 in my garage that has ~300 hours on the stock top end!
Click to expand...


WOW, bet it starts hard and is way down on power. My buddies gets to about 1700 miles / 130 hours ish and starts to get flat and loose power.
 
I have an 03 yz250 and 09 wr300. Really do love both. You can scream the YZ to the moon on the open and fast stuff, throw a fww on it and chug a lug. I only have a 9oz fww and it stil does a great job of not stalling out on me.

I do love the extra chugability of the WR 300.On steep and technical hills, that motor just kills it. As we all know, the tougher the trails the better the bike seems to be.

The YZ bonuses for me are its lighter, parts are everywhere, and because of that you can custom build it to be exactly what you want. Cons to the YZ, very hard to find reliable stator for lighting. I am contemplating installing the 300 kit and WR 3,4,5 gears for a true wide ratio, 300cc two stroke that weighs in at about 225 lbs.

They really are both great bikes, but I would have to give a slight nod to Yamaha for overall build quality (not that I have had major issues, but there are some odd quirks like the rivets in the WR silencer just falling out) and parts availability. Either way, I guarantee you will be stoked. They both really are great bikes.
 
Chums said:
Since you pointed out you have a 165 and this next bike will be a second bike... do the 300. I have both, 165 and 300 and am glad! I just think the 250 is to close to the 165 in torque and power. I didn't want 2 bikes that were that similar. Now when I need a high speed sledge hammer I pull out the brut 300 and when I don't I ride the 165. Works out great!
Click to expand...


Bingo. I have a 165 and CR250 husky, gives you choices for your mood that day.
 
Yeah, still have the mikuni. Was thinking about a different carb (lectron) but wasn't sure if it would solve it. I have the jd jet kit now which solved some probs, one of them being seizing lol!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top