• Hi everyone,

    As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.

    When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.

    Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.

    Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.

    Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.

    Thanks for your patience and support!

2015 Husky idea

I agree. Most guys want the biggest/baddest things. Doesn't mean you can ride them faster, just means you have a b ad bike.

When you go get a truck, are you gettin a V6 in it or a Hemi? Most will get the Hemi.

So let's get a 430 or 500 2st and I bet they sell like hotcakes.
 
When the owners say "get back to their roots" it appears to me they mean KTM roots so if you guys are wishing for a big bore 2 stroke you should be looking back at the KTM engines sorry to say. Not knocking KTM but all my readings of the old talk and new talks brings me to a different conclusion and that being KTM based products totally.
 
True, a modern 300 makes all the power you really need. However, there is a certain mystique about a 500cc two stroke. CR500 and KX500 af's still sell. Plus I don't care what anyone says, a big 500cc RULES in the sand! If team Kawasaki still ran a KX500 in the desert, it would still dominate. I think with more cc's you have more headroom to tune the power characteristics while keeping tons of torque. Again, just my two cents, I think having a modern 500cc 2 stroke would not only fill a niche, but just create a ton of industry buzz
 
Plus I don't care what anyone says, a big 500cc RULES in the sand! If team Kawasaki still ran a KX500 in the desert, it would still dominate.

So, you think that the Kawasaki factory team, plus a TON of guys out there who are racing as privateers, are simply cloosing not to run a KX500 because they don't want to win?

No way. If a KX500 would still win in the desert, people would still be racing on them. Racers race to win, they don't purposely pick slower equipment. The 500s were cool bikes but their time has passed.
 
Okay, let me be a little more specific. If Kawasaki continued to build and sell a modernized KX500, it would still win. They all race the 450 because well, that's what all the factories sell. Lets face it, they're still heavy and those motors are an EXPENSIVE time bomb. The big KX dominated dez racing in the mid to late 90's till Kawasaki pulled the plug on their race efforts. And I guess by sand I mean dunes. Nothing can beat a big two stroke up a huge dune.

I agree that a big 500 doesn't really make sense for most types of riding. I ride my 250 90% of the time. But riding motorcycles isn't always about practicality, it's about adrenalin and passion, and for me and some others, nothing beats the rush of pointing a 500 in a straight line or towards a huge hill and pulling the trigger
 
add on, rode some baja set up KX500s, when setup well-blueprinted and balanced, with well tuned suspension and especially the ones with heavier add-on flywheels. These were actually quite smooth, still high power, but with those high gears and heavy flywheels they were "4 stroke like"
 
Lets face it, they're still heavy

A KX500 was about 235 pounds. a Modern KX450 is actually lighter. I own a KX500 and have had many big bore 2 strokes. I think they are fun but other than deep sand and dez I dont see them being that useful anymore. Fun yes, for sure.
 
actually, i do. and it confirms my statement.

the average 300cc (or 250cc) dirtbike puts out 50-55 hp. you can tune those engines to 70-75 hp. take two of those, and you'll arrive at "reliable" 100-110 hp (same as a standard supersports bike) or "high-end racing" 140-150hp (same as the moto2 engine, slightly above 500cc 2t v2). you may want to add 10-20 hp, to consider "grand prix level efforts", but please consider the same also for the 4t engine.

i'm a huge fan of the 600cc-v2 concept, bytheway. for a road bike.




yes, i was exagerating, but you finally understood my point :-) i wonder about the real cost of a moto3 engine...

r

Rasputin - do some research and educate yourself , just, that little bit.

250cc twin 2ts, in their final years, were getting well over 100 HP at the rear wheel. The Aprilia / Gilera, somewhere between 110 /120. "Rumour" had it, that the "favoured riders" were into the 120+ mark. Standard rs250r Hondas, that you could purchase, had 92PS / 90.74HP @ 12,500rpm and 52.3NM 12,000rpm , or more, and they were completely uncompetive, at high levels. You'd have to fork out a lot of money for at least basic kits, and even more bags of money, given to noted tuners. Pedrosa's Honda, was reputed to have 109 HP at the rear wheel. In 2005. Goodness knows what Hiroshi Aoyama's 250 had, in the last year of 250 GPs - sure, it just used Pedrosa's spare parts....... Anyone that think's Honda did not 'help' in the background, to win the very final 250GP Championships (that they'd had a large hand in killing off) - well, I've got a prime bit of real estate a few Ks away from me, on Single Ridges Road, Yellowrock, going that's perfectly safe in bushfires, that you might just want to pay through the nose for............... (insensitive, Moi? - nope, just having ridden in the Blue Mountains as my 'back yard" for decades, and saying, rather loudly, at various council meetings, that houses should never have been built in so many areas, we are now in the middle of a few hundred of those houses burning).

If you want to 'play with numbers', then knock the total down a smidge? - I've given you some numbers above to play with, go for it. So, 2,4 x say, 90.74HP, of a 'garden variety' rs250r, from over 1/2 a decade ago = 217.776. I've used the 'gutless' 250 number, to make up for any error / fudge factor within the simple 2.4 multiplier.

Seriously, are you that uniformed about 2 strokes? Are you that locked into the 4-$ Stroke delusion?

The NSR500vs were produced between 1996 to 2001 - I think first "for sale" ones were in 97. Apparently, only 20 /22 full bikes were made, but, of course, more engines were made. Still, they were a sold item - not a leased bike, and quite a few still exist, in private hands.

So, another set of numbers for you to play with - Honda gave out specs of 135HP @ 10,250rpm, in 1997, I think. Over a decade and a half ago, with a VTwin, reed valve 2t, with 2 x 40mm Keihin carbs. So, go 'click, click' on a calculator, with a 1.2 multiplier = 162 HP, with a 103KG weight. Give thought to just what a small amount of 'progress' that could be applied to that 'base' power unit would bring to those figures.

Exagerating makes you look foolish, to me. And, my understanding your point? Understand this point - educate yourself, and you'll become more knowledgable, if you take it in.

Yup, Moto 2 Racing ( and, 'lower down', Supersports World Championships - hence my referal to 600cc 4s and 675cc triples - that have more HP, still, I think, than Honda's 'spec' 600CBR engines in Moto 3) - cutting edge 'mid' ( and there's a very visible joke on what racing has become, even at 'near' the highest level ) capacity Road Race GP competition.

It's a bloody sad state of affairs, I think. Just as 250cc 4t and 450cc 4t racing is. Handicap class racing, it's as simple, and 'sorry,' as that .

300cc 2ts? Quite the weapon, but, in a tip to old, old FIM rules that banned simple overbores of 250 2ts, as they started to 'swamp' the big 4ts in the mid / late sixties, I'd like to see more than just overbored 250s being used, in a real, Open / or 'up to 450cc' class. When private owners, through the use of existing companies, and existing parts, can make their 250cc KTMs into up to 434cc bikes, I'd like to see Manufacturers oblidge to make more of an effort, that just overboring a 250. In the 500 class days, over the years, many different sizes, were run against each other. Husky owners / officienado's, surely would know that. There was no 'universal solution', until the dieing days of the 500 class, which, of course, then allowed up to 650 cc 4ts in. The faster / easier to ride 'privateer' Honda 500s, right up till the CRF 450R was realeased - well, quite a few of them were debored etc, down to 400 /430 cc.
 
i understand:
when i say that a privateer's 500cc/600cc v2 race bike could give 140-150 hp with current "state of knowledge", and 160-170 hp with further efforts, then i am "uninformed and need to educate myself".
now when you say the same (162 hp), then you are an omnipotent god teaching irrevocable wisdom, and entitled to derogate others.
:busted:

maybe you want to complement your "rumors" and "reputed power numbers" about gp2 bikes with some hard facts: since the end of gp2, the ex-aprilia developers posted a lot of info and even official power curves on the internet.
maybe you want to read a bit about the "accuracy" of dyno hp numbers (since you're throwing all honda specs at me, i'd like to mention that just today this company has proven that they cannot even count to 10).

maybe you want to consider general engine capacity scale effects (i.e. chapter 3 in dixon's two-stroke book), and capacity-related two-stroke power potential, before hinting that you can simply multiply a 250cc twin's power by 2.4 if you want to "calculate" the "potential" of a 600cc twin. if things were all so easy, then the world of banshee/cheetah/tz/rz tuners must consist of idiots only, they all should "do some research and educate themselves", right? ;)

i'm over and done with this multi-cylinder discussion. it's off-topic anyway, i'll keep following this discussion about 500cc singles, i'm not sure yet whether i would want one, and i wonder about how many "generally interested" people would actually buy one in the end.

r
 
I remember in the 60's when top Yamaha riders would race their 250 2T bikes in the 350 race, to get the start money. They would then drop out, as not to get technical scrutiny, if they had finished.

500 and larger 2T singles are just a "Buzz" producer.... if they had any real potential at this time, Maico would be the market leader!
 
i swear kawasaki did a 720 2 stroke, h2 so yeh if big cc was viable then we would still have the option to buy one, manufactures dont support a dead market too often.
 
If any of you really think you need a 80HP big bore 2 stroke have at it...

Fullscreen+capture+10212013+10838+PM.jpg
 
Might as well be talking about what would happen with a modernized EFI XR650R....at least it would have broader application.
 
Back
Top