• 2 Stroke Husqvarna Motorcycles Made In Italy - About 1989 to 2014
    WR = 2st Enduro & CR = 2st Cross

  • Hi everyone,

    As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.

    When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.

    Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.

    Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.

    Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.

    Thanks for your patience and support!

All 2st 125, 144, 165, 177 You do all know there is a 250 'off the shelf'

Using that logic... Why do people bore out their 250's to 295 or 315? They should just buy a 500, right? Or is there something I'm missing... :cheers:
 
I just can't see the point of buying a 125, then putting a 144 kit on it then putting a 165 kit on it then putting a 177 kit on it. I hear people on here raving about how much better their 125 is with a 177 kit on it, well of course it is, its a different fish! You're only 70cc off a 250. Why not buy a 250 in the first place.

How long's it gonna be before I hear, '....my 250's much better with the 200 kit fitted'


.............or am I missing the point here?
:popcorn:
 
IMO the 165 is awesome for enduros and trail riding but it's extremely hard to ride at hare scramble pace for 3 hours and not suffer from mistakes that come with a long fatiguing race on a constantly deteriorating race course. i know i could go faster on a 250 with less effort and fatigue. having said that, last season i was 160lbs, had shoulder issues, and my riding fitness was way down; hoping to be stronger this season after rebuilding my shoulder over the winter. perhaps that will make all the difference.... :D
 
the thin line is power to weight to durability to cost, the great thing about the old (italian) 125 was the initial low price which makes the mods viable that and the fact that the bore had alot of extra wall thickness to accept the overbore.any engine performance modifications will have an adverse effect on durability of various components and so decrease long term reliability.everything has a trade off to some level but if you can take a bike of a certain weight to the limit of its components reliability at a low cost then it should out perform anything off the shelf.
 
Using that logic... Why do people bore out their 250's to 295 or 315? They should just buy a 500, right? Or is there something I'm missing... :cheers:



I'm not sure doing this is as popular as it was. 250 2T's produce more than enough power and riders tend to consentrate on better suspension and handling to go quicker. On a 125, riders are always looking for more power, hence the kits. But 177! how close to 250 do you wanna get?

And how well does the rest of the engine that was designed for 125cc power cope before it pops.




Hey GhostRider, that video. What the..........what happened there. I've never seen anything like that before.
 
And how well does the rest of the engine that was designed for 125cc power cope before it pops.
Kawasaki built the KDX 200 and KDX 220 models on the KX 125 bottom end and frame design. They were very durable, even when people put the 240 top end kit on their 220s.
 
There's a saying in the auto racing community.
"It's a lot more fun to drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow".
That's one of the reasons I ride a 125.
I race MX and run Vet A. I don't win in that class, but I go pretty hard. My style is wide open throttle, high RPM's, and lot's of shifting. Even if I'm not really fast, it sure feels like it :banana:
If I had a 250, I'd probably kill my self. I don't think I could ride the style I like, with all that power, and that wouldn't be nearly as much fun.
Now that I'm a little faster, a little older, and a little more responsible with the power, it's nice to have the option of a 144, or 165.
 
makes me wanna sell my 360 for a nimble 125, must admit i never felt the lack of power was there as i could keep up with 250's.

oh and the only time it was lacking is on the road at full tilt, but then i was doing about 70mph and can keep up with cars happly too.
 
I'm not sure doing this is as popular as it was. 250 2T's produce more than enough power and riders tend to consentrate on better suspension and handling to go quicker. On a 125, riders are always looking for more power, hence the kits. But 177! how close to 250 do you wanna get?

And how well does the rest of the engine that was designed for 125cc power cope before it pops.




Hey GhostRider, that video. What the..........what happened there. I've never seen anything like that before.

A 177 is only halfway between a 125 and a 250. It's an intermediate engine size that shouldn't be considered a stepping stone toward a 250 - it's a final destination for many of us whose style/size/strength favors a small bore over a 250.

With that said - Why does a KTM 350SXF exist? Because people don't want the power or weight of a 450, but they want more power than a 250. The same could be said about a 250 and 125 2stroke. It started with a 144, which many thought to be the perfect engine size, so it's natural to take it a step further with the 165 (or 2 steps in the case of the 177). KTM is making a killling by offering these 'intermediate' engine sizes - look at their lineup! lol.

Simply put - for me, and a lot of other guys, the 125 is too weak, and the 250 is too strong, and we don't want a KTM 200 for a number of reasons. So you can have the best of both worlds, best handling and lightest weight, and the most usable power delivery for your style. The other option is to 'retard' the power of a 250 2 stroke, but then you're sacrificing the handling and weight in favor of a more usable power delivery.

If it's not your style - then don't buy it. :)

I agree with the reliability issues in MOST bikes, but Husky's have seen great results with bored engines due to oversized bottom end components (read Walt's post in the 125/144/165/177 thread).
 
Yamaha IT 125, 175, 200, 250, 490

Kawasaki KDX 175, 200, 220, 400

Suzuki PE 175, 250, 400

There was a time when the 175/200 was a dominate fixture in the enduro scene.

KTM 200 has a loyal cult following, myself included.

There was a reason why Penton developed the 125 and 175 cc for the nasty ISDE's back in the day.

I enjoyed my 250's, but have become faster on the smaller bike. After 3 hours the smaller bike becomes your best friend!
 
Local guy who is apparently not wired right in the head. No idea why he likes to hide out, but doesn't seem to be any harm (other than getting run over)


I've had the guy climb out of a hiding spot (buried himself in straw from parking lot construction) 10-15' away from where myself and buddies were sitting on our bikes waiting for the rest of the group. Creepy as hell.
 
lol dude got worked a little. It looks like he's a white bald guy from the last second of that clip. Looks like he thought no one would cut that line. He ended up right on the fast line thru there....
 
Back
Top