I checked them out when working on the 125 and felt their diameters were close to the Husky. I thought it was as step in the wrong direction. I may be wrong.
Husky's had the older TMX in a 59/60 ish needle. The older TMX likes a leaner slide than the rich 3. RM was 2.60 -64 on there's' and 5 slide. That's why I went that way to feed fuel. I also researched the KTM's.
I do have a hunch? Looking @ a KTM parts fiche for an 04 125.
KTM uses a 69 needle and 55 slide for the PWK/125SX (Richer needle and Richer slide).
KTM uses a 72 needle and 65 slide for the PWK/125EXC (Leaner needle and Leaner slide).
Also, they have a 60 slide available.
Is this why the PWK is loosing topend with the 70 slide, is it getting to lean?
My next move was to order a 50, 55, 60 slide for PWK 38
Start with high 60 ish Diameter needles and work down. I was going to buy all the KTM needles for 125SX.
I think if you hit it just right, this will be the best carb, by far, indefinately. It takes time and money,though.
I would also send it to RB designs. Carb divide it in the front and also the rear.
http://www.ktmpartspitstop.com/pages/parts/viewbybrand/13/KTM.aspx
Also, The RM we had, we put shims under the spring to delay the powervalve to hit more around 8,000 RPM. I read the KTM liked the powervalve delayed in I think in the high 7900's. The Husky 125 also likes the delayed hit on mine.
I also stumbled on a couple of things. Why is the 06 powervalve spring stiffer than the 09? I won't know till I test them? Same part #? Is this why some run good and others don't off the bat? Did I get a bike with a lesser tensioned spring?
I also have a hunch inside the 09 Cylinder but won't know till I do some mods to it and get it on the 06 engine to try.