• Hi everyone,

    As you all know, Coffee (Dean) passed away a couple of years ago. I am Dean's ex-wife's husband and happen to have spent my career in tech. Over the years, I occasionally helped Dean with various tech issues.

    When he passed, I worked with his kids to gather the necessary credentials to keep this site running. Since then (and for however long they worked with Coffee), Woodschick and Dirtdame have been maintaining the site and covering the costs. Without their hard work and financial support, CafeHusky would have been lost.

    Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been working to migrate the site to a free cloud compute instance so that Woodschick and Dirtdame no longer have to fund it. At the same time, I’ve updated the site to a current version of XenForo (the discussion software it runs on). The previous version was outdated and no longer supported.

    Unfortunately, the new software version doesn’t support importing the old site’s styles, so for now, you’ll see the XenForo default style. This may change over time.

    Coffee didn’t document the work he did on the site, so I’ve been digging through the old setup to understand how everything was running. There may still be things I’ve missed. One known issue is that email functionality is not yet working on the new site, but I hope to resolve this over time.

    Thanks for your patience and support!

Looked at some different brands today

NWRider

Husqvarna
AA Class
My Husky dealer is an hour from me but I have a close Honda/KTM dealer so I looked at a 250X and a 150XC during my lunch break today. I am still healing up from some broken feet and won’t be riding for another month or so but that gives me lots of time to think about bikes. I would like to get something new after this whole ordeal is over. I also have time to write out long post like this.

Bike 1: CRF 250X – They have a bunch of new 07 models for 4k. The price is right. This probably would have been the perfect bike for me to learn on a few years back but I do not know if it would make sense now. I can ride a 125 in steep technical terrain so maybe I would just be wasting these skills on a tame 250f? Or maybe it would let me focus more on my speed and actually be a good thing? I don’t know.

What I have always liked about this bike is how quiet it is. Unlike most of the thumpers I hear in the woods the X is very silent. And Honda engineers seem to have done a good job designing the bike to be quiet because all the dynos I have seen show that more fee flowing exhaust really do not make the bike any faster. If I remember right the X is also significantly quieter than most bikes even with the same silencer (for example an X is 93DB with a Q and the KTM is 96). As much as people like to bash Honda sound is important to me and I don’t have a problem rewarding a job well done with my money.

I am not worried about power. I rode a stock one once and there was lots of low end. The top was kind of weak but I am sure uncorked it would be enough. The bike felt very easy to ride as the power was mellow, focused on the bottom end, and tractable. I don’t really care if some other brand has a couple more horsepower, the X had plenty for where I ride. Maintenance worries me but I think the 06 and up ones do not have valve problems nearly as frequently as the early models. The bike looks like a nightmare to work on though. I would never consider a 2 stroke with a carb so buried but I imagine with the X I would just find the recommended jetting, set it once, and leave it. Maybe change once a year from winter to summer.

Ergos felt good but the bars need to come up and forward. A cheap set of big bar adaptors should do the trick. I would probably get a tall seat also. Clutch pull was excellent. The bike is heavy though. Picking it up from the silencer was a chore and just rocking the bike back and forth I could feel the weight. I think all the e-start thumpers are going to feel like this. I care a lot about weight which is why I am on a 125.

Husky Content: I started thinking about a 250f when the 2010 Huskies came out.

At first I thought a TC250 would be a great light woods bike. Everyone says they start easy. But the mags all say they suck to start and it appears the reason is because they tested them in the summer. Supposedly no amount of jetting will help. So I guess that bike it out. Summer is the main time of year when I can actually put more power to the ground then my 125 has.

Then there is the TXC250. I am not a technophobe but am now worried about the fuel injection. At first I was excited but then I found out how much Husky wants for a fuel pump. I am also disappointed that Husky chose Mikuni instead of Keihin (my bias comes from 2-stroke experience). I am also not sure I can deal with the little issues. For example Kelly recently had the temperature sensor go out. This may be a simple thing to fix but how am I going to diagnose that type of problem in my garage? The TXC would probably still be the best 250f choice for me but it is not exciting me enough to want to spend 7 grand on one. If it was quiet and had a big tank I would be much more interested



Bike 2: 150XC – This is the bike I wish Husky was making. I would be so excited that I would have to run out and buy one. But instead it is made by the company that would normally be my last choice. But it is really cool that the bike comes with a factory 144 (not just overbore but with an optimal stroke and a special pipe also) . The KTM tank is actually a bigger selling point to me then the extra displacement. The tank is big, it is clear, and it carries the weight low. Why can’t Husky do something so simple!

I am actually more scared of maintaining one of these then I am a 250X! Ktmtalk has tons of post about grenading 144s. But I am not sure that the newer ones have the problems since they mellowed out the ignition. I think if I did not try to run it on straight pump gas, and I made sure the jetting was on the rich side, it would live. But I imagine I would still be doing top ends two are three times more frequently then I would on a Husky. This is acceptable if it is a $100 job but if it is a ktm oem big $$$ piston every time then I would not get one of these. Also the XC is in a milder state of tune then the SX so it might not have issues and it could even come with a 2 ring piston.

Ergos felt good. Not as perfect as a Husky but with the bars all the way forward it would fit. The clutch sucks though. The KTM crowd loves to brag about there hydrollic cluthes but the fact is the clutch pull is about three times harder than my WR125. I know they are not built tougher either as exploding clutch baskets are not rare on KTM 125/144/150/200 models.

The bike feels like it is probably ten pounds lighter then my WR. One thing I never complain about is weight on a KTM.

The 7k price tag is also a big drawback to the bike. Of course a WR125 is not much cheaper by the time I buy a tank(if one is ever available). I think all the setup the 150 would need would be springs for my weight, a spark arrestor, guards, and plastics of any other color.


I really have a hard time imagining riding anything other than a Husky though. I like the ergos, the way they turn, the way the front end stays on the ground when climbing, and the way they lay down power.
Realistically I will probably end up getting another WR125 and dealing with the issues. Alternatively I might do some nice upgrades on my 06 and buy a new discounted second bike. This is where the 4k 250X might fit in. But I would really have to consider a discounted Husky WR250 also. I know they are great bikes and most of my parts would interchange. They are heavy but no more than the X. I also kind of like the YZ250, not that you can find a new one cheap anymore. I wonder if I had the compression lowered and retarded the timing a little if the power would be a little more woods friendly? I still would like to look at a Gasgas 125(due to the great gas tank) but I am afraid I am way too tall for one.

Anyway, this is what I have been thinking about lately while unable to ride.
 
I know what you mean about the KTM 150.. they got the concept right on that one.. but from what your hearing the mechanical not so much... As far as the Honda 250X it's a great handling great performing bike... but even jetting its a pain in the butt....

I have caught myself driving by the KTM dealer in town a lot more lately...
 
the 250X is a good bike but IMHO not near the bike the 2010 250F husky is. the husky IMHO handles WAY better, is lighter and feels WAY lighter. the X is a turd to work on. Buddy of mine drown his in a medium creek crossing and we spent almost an hour and half pulling the subframe and pulling the carb to get it to run again. Everything was a huge struggle to get to and disassemble / assemble. I HATE that style of aluminum frame. Hard to do valve jobs on and many need that a lot.

the 2010 TC250 is NOT hard to start, Ty and crew as well as many here that actually OWN the bikes say so. I have kick started one several times in 65 degree weather. It is an EZ 1-2 kick deal every time. The TXC temp control issues was actually quite EZ to find, plugged the iBeat in ($300) and it told me the issue. Ordered the $8 part and was on my way. Crap breaks on bikes so thats that. This is the most complicated bike I have ever owned with EFI and e-start and is VERY EZ to work on. I LOVE that about huskys.

The 144/150 KTM's are blowing up in big ways, read KTMtalk. Cool bike but not going to last as long as the WR125 IMHO. Your more than welcome to try mine when your ready (and the 250).

husky has some great deals / incentives coming right about now on the 2 strokes. Might consider a WR250 as well. cheap and stone reliable.
 
Kelly - Husky Relic posted this in another thread

...every magazine was given a brand new TC250. We didn't use the same bike over and over. All exhibited some sort of starting issue(compounded by the fact the testing was done in August and September two of the hottest months of the year). We were not the only distributor to complain about this issue. We attempted every jetting and set-up mod we could to sort the problem out. Unfortunately there was no silver bullet for the problem....

That is what made me think they will not start when hot. It is odd as all the owners say they start great. I guess if they still say the same thing in the summer I will not be worried.

I did not know the ibeat told you what is wrong. That is cool. I was thinking I would have to pack the bike all the way to Salem everytime some weird problem happened.

Thanks
 
I thought the same way. Maybe the KTM 150. Then I saw the price tag and said no way. Plus you have to get the suspension on those just right or end up with a spine tap. I had a KTM 250 and hate the rear shocks without linkage.
I decided to go 09 Wr125, save some money and take the extra when I go to re-ring it and punch it out to a 144. I should just need new front and rear springs. I have to say, I think the 125 screams pretty darn good the way it is!.

Typpyt!
 
I'm not sure how the bored and stroked KTM 144 is optimal over a simple over bored 144 when the motors grenade on a regular basis?
I have to admit that I stare at the 150XC in the local KTM shop regularly!

The biggest factor against the Honda, is that it has to be disassembled to do a jetting change. I'm not sure what other maintenance requires tearing the bike apart?

Factory WR150 for '11 is the word on the street.:thumbsup:
 
NWRider;84151 said:
Kelly - Husky Relic posted this in another thread

...every magazine was given a brand new TC250. We didn't use the same bike over and over. All exhibited some sort of starting issue(compounded by the fact the testing was done in August and September two of the hottest months of the year). We were not the only distributor to complain about this issue. We attempted every jetting and set-up mod we could to sort the problem out. Unfortunately there was no silver bullet for the problem....

That is what made me think they will not start when hot. It is odd as all the owners say they start great. I guess if they still say the same thing in the summer I will not be worried.

That is concerning / puzzling. :excuseme:

NWRider;84151 said:
I did not know the ibeat told you what is wrong. That is cool. I was thinking I would have to pack the bike all the way to Salem everytime some weird problem happened.

this is the only issue i have had in over a 1000 miles. Taking it the 20 miles for you once if it had an issue should not be a huge ordeal. Would rather drive to salem than pull one of those farking CRF's apart again. :banghead: Thew iBeat showed the temp gauge pinned and an error message saying the temp sensor was not working. When i checked the wires they were find. Ordered the $8 temp sensor, screwed it in (super simple) and bam, back in biz. I found it all kinda cool that i could diagnose a electrical issue via software. I have the iBeat and we are close enough you can borrow it or whatever if you go that route.
 
Norman Foley;84155 said:
I'm not sure how the bored and stroked KTM 144 is optimal over a simple over bored 144 when the motors grenade on a regular basis?
I have to admit that I stare at the 150XC in the local KTM shop regularly!

The biggest factor against the Honda, is that it has to be disassembled to do a jetting change. I'm not sure what other maintenance requires tearing the bike apart?

Factory WR150 for '11 is the word on the street.:thumbsup:

The Honda also have 2 oils to change which is an idea i have never liked. Valves on some get tight real fast. Airbox is hard to get the filter in and hard to see if you got it in right. The whole bike just seems very hard to work on after owning a husky. I would guess you would spend 2x the time maintaining it than a husky.

Norm, heard the same thing. I'm sure it is the WR125 with the 144 kit factory installed like the WR300.
 
Sorry if i am coming off as way to pro husky. I just hate the CRF's, all of them. they do nothing for me. I realize they are fantastic MX bikes though.

As for the KTM 150 thats a bike i could like if not for all the exploding motor reports. I rode couple year old KTM 125 and really liked it. Was pretty fast. Not wild over the PDS but the last few generations seem real good.
 
I'll throw the Bull$hit flag on the hard starting TC 250's. I don't care what Husky Relic or anyone else says... my TC 250 has started in 2 kicks cold 95% of the time regardless of ambient temps and usually under 5 kicks hot (never more than 10). Compared to my '09 Honda CRF 250R, which required a busload (FULL STAFF) of relief kickers to get fired in every situation prior to me going into cardiac arrest... the TC 250 is a Godsend!

Either I got a TC that was annointed by God, or the magazine testers are morons. While I'd LOVE to think that God chose to annoint me and my TC... I think the realistic conclusion is that the magazine testers are morons.

I will say that I think it was stupid for Husky to keep the hot start button at the carb instead of putting a lever on the bars. STUPID.
 
I had a 2005 CRF 250X as my first dirtbike. Here are my pros and cons:

Pros:
>Easy to boost the power by swapping OEM 250R parts (muffler, cam, etc) and a doing a few other cheap, easy mods.
>Suspensions is the best ever. Light years better than my KTM or the Husky 450.
>Lots of aftermarket support. Goodies are plentiful and inexpensive.

Cons:
>Never could get the thing to run right. A JD jetting kit helped a lot, but the bike was always REALLY hard to start.
>Valves were a problem the entire time. We shimmed the valves probably 5 times and then I finally had to send the head off for a $400 redo with steel valves.
>The two oil thing was somewhat annoying but not a deal breaker. Nothing will ever live up to the sheer frustration of changing the oil on a KTM RFS bike! lol

Now, on the plus side, I think Honda listened to its riders and fixed most of this stuff in later models. I'd do some searches on Thumpertalk and crfsonly.com and see if the problems still plague the 07s.
 
I am mainly just checking out bikes due to boredom and wanting to ride. But I thought the two I looked at today had some good points and bad like all bikes. I have yet to actually ride a non-Husky that I like as much as my current bike so I am not really excited about trying anything different.

The main attraction to the X is how quiet it is. It seems to have a reputation for good handling and suspension but that does not mean it would be as comfortable for me as a Husky is. I think the 06 and newer have better valves, and a fix is not that expensive so that is not a deal killer with the low entry price. I have plenty of evenings to wrench but not a lot of days to ride so the extra work is not a huge deal. The difference would be that a Husky is almost enjoyable to work on, well except for the 5 or so times a year I have to pull the swingarm, that is getting old. The new 250R is supposed to start super easy and be a good woods bike but I would never find one for 4 grand and if I spend lots more than that it will be for a euro bike.

I have not seen too many problems with the 150 after they changed the ignition. It would never take the hours of a WR though. I just wish the Husky had the same style of tank. I alway feel like I am about to crash on a KTM also so I am not sure I could ever get comfortable.

I wanted a TE but after getting hit by a guy going 80mph in the middle of town I am scared off of riding on the street.

I also saw this for $5300, and it comes with $500 in parts. I think I fit on a WR250 better anyway and I can get one for the same price.
http://www.halls-cycles.com/Bike Inventory/New Bikes/2008-GAS-GAS-EC250.htm

I am not sure what I would do with a 250 anyway. I really just like to ride slow tech stuff and the WR125 rules there. In summer when traction is great is the main time I would use a 250. Maybe in the snow also.
 
related side note the euro based machines are usually born with field maintenance in mind (born from WEC). So all the usual up keep jobs are field expedient. the no drop wheel spacers, easy to reach carb, quick release air box/filters, quick release seats, quick remove fuel tanks, same sized hardware for the most part, axle pulls, easy access motor, etc etc .
the Japanese model machines are born from MX/SX (the F1 of offroad racing) everything is done in the shop and the race is a sprint, field expedient maintenance is dropped in favor of the latest high tech moto gp chassis etc etc. well ok the crf-x has a quick access air box now (I think) ,,,,born from the JCR Baja team. my 2 cents
PS the HM Hondas of the WEC Jolly Racing team (Ahola) are super nice, I would be happy to have one of those CRFs in my garage (prefer the 250)
 
There's alot of good bikes out there.

I personally wouldn't consider a ktm150 until I KNOW the engine is reliable. My 08 200 has been ueber-bulletproof (530 or so hrs right now), and I have never heard of significant problems with the 125's, so that tells me there was some mistake made with the 150 top end.
 
CRF 250x is an e-start mtn goat and will go anywhere, anytime and outlast the rider.

the 150 xc is freakin awesome. good luck getting to the plug though. plus that wrap around tank = overheating in the nasties i guarantee ya. seat height is the same as my WR125 plus mines flatter. i can buy 1.5 wr's for what the 150XC is going for. that will change as the year drags on though and leftovers are blown out. i'd buy one at 35% off if i didnt have my wr. i can also build a jap LMS bike w/ lights way way cheaper that will do everything it can. the 150XC is a bitchen neato concept and id love to see more. i heard it replaced the 200- that's sucks!

btw- the 150's were popping due to a ring snagging. at least from what i hear. and, i hear that has been cured, 100%. KTM has been and still does make one of if not the most reliable 2t on the planet. someone goofed on the big bore kit though and rings were snagging and going bang. correct me if im wrong.
 
Kelly – I know what you mean about the Gasgas being small. This is the main reason I went to Husky initially instead of Gasgas. The more I think about it though the X is too small also. And if I am going to pack that much weight around why not just get a EC200 and not have valves to maintain.

I think the 144/150 issues where with the ring catching the exhaust port. This bike does not have an exhaust bridge which probably contributes to the problem. But I also think the 144 ignition was way too aggressive. I believe as RPMs get real high the timing is supposed to retard some to keep heat down. I don’t think the 144 did much of this. The 125 ignition is actually less aggressive and is the fix. The bikes also seem to suffer massive detonation. I would not run pump gas in one of these which would probably take care of that problem. But from the ride reports I have seen the 150XC is not really fast like the SX. If it is like the bigger KTM bikes the XC version will have a much less aggressive ignition. I think the major problems might be sorted with this bike but like I said I would never expect it to be low maintenance like the Husky. And there is no guarantee that the problems are really fixed. I really don’t see myself buying a KTM anyway. I just wish other brands would create a bike in this niche.

Now I just need to decide what Husky to buy.
 
pvduke;84273 said:
CRF 250x is an e-start mtn goat and will go anywhere, anytime and outlast the rider.

Several people in my club outlasted their 250x's and got rid of them after having to do multiple valve jobs in a season. Maybe the newer ones are better, but it seems like even the guys with durable 4strokes around here have mostly gone back to 2strokes for backcountry trailriding.
 
ok pulled some case history's. the main reason for valve issues is lack of maint, diry air filters and impropper valve jobs. these 4t "X" motors (not the "R"), both 450 and 250 are sledge hammers. i personally seen magazine test motors torndown with well over 200 hard hours on them and things were still well within spec.

if a bike needed more than one v/j a season that sure aint the motors fault, that i can say with confidence.
 
Back
Top